Randall RG100ES vs. RH150
-
So for you Randall users, if you had the choice between a RG100es (Dimebag favored) or a RH150, which would you choose? theres a RH150 at my local GC for 300 bucks, and a RG100es on craigslist for 200 (both come with footswitch.)
Ive been wanting that RH, but Ive recently been reading some reviews where they talk about a few problems (very bassy. vol. cuts out,)
So before its too late, should I try to get the RG?note: the RH150 has built in effects. and I like some chorus in my clean..so thats a plus on the RH end
-
it sounded pretty good when i tried it. (effect wise) but the distortion seemed to lessen out on the higher frets and strings, is that normal? this was on the RH150
-
The RH150 is a fine amp, IMO. It is very bassy indeed, but nothing that can't be solved by being conservative with the bass knob.
The RH150 can get you a very Pantera-esque tone if you want it to.
The RH150 has independent EQ controls for each channel.
I think what you're hearing about the distortion lessen on the high notes is because the Randall is much less compressed/saturated than the high-gain models on the Spider. The Randall's definitely gonna be more unforgiving about inconsistent playing. It's definitely a high gain amp, but it's not UBER UBER gainy, IMO. If you feel it's not gainy enough for you, you could try a boost with it.
The chorus on the RH150 (is it a G3?) is actually pretty decent too. I don't think it's digital.
That being said, tho, I haven't really tried the RG100ES...
-
As someone who owned a RG80XP (The little brother of the RG100ES with circuitry that reduced the volume drop when the sustain boost is one), I think the RH150 is a better amp. It has more gain and a tighter, more modern sound. The RG80/100 is more of a "classic" sounding amp in the vein of 80's amps like Marshalls and Mark-series Boogies and needs a boost and an EQ to give you a modern sound.
If you can, FIND THE G3+, NOT THE NORMAL G3. The G3 is looser, has even more bass, less gain, and has reliability problems. The G3+ solves those problems.
As for the cab, whats your budget? You can probably find a V30-loaded Carvin Legacy cab for around $300 - $400. I haven't heard many good things about Randall Jaguar speakers, and I own a 1x12 that is loaded with one, and its... less than adequate.
-
The guy who has the cab originally said he valued it at 250, after seeing some pictures. Its certainly not that much. A few people on random forums i searched said they wouldnt pay more than 200 ish for a good condition one. This ones pretty beat up. Im thinkin about proposing to trade the vypyr and a few bucks cash
-
On the G3 vs. G3+ matter: I have not tried the G3+, if I must be honest, so take this as a grain of salt...
However, I have tried both the G2 and G3 series. There is a difference between both, yes, but it's not nearly as big.
What I'm trying to say is that even though there surely is a difference between the G3 and G3+, but, in my most humble opinion, I REALLY doubt that you'll go "Yeah, the G3 sounds plain unusable compared to the G3+". I'm dead sure that with a little bit of tweaking, they can be made to sound quite close. It's not like they re-invent the design from the ground up every time they come up with a G-something update.
I doubt you'll find the G3 sounds too bad if you dig the G3+, especially if you have a tight budget and already found an ok deal on a G3.
Hell, >I< have liked the G3 (and G2) for the style of music that I dig over several tube amps.