Eet Fuk on reverb
Eet Fuk on reverb
Good deal here!
ESP MX 220 EET FUK 1989 Olympic White, James Hetfield, Metallica
https://reverb.com/item/6764058-esp-mx-220-eet-fuk-1989-olympic-white-james-hetfield-metallica
Those inlays look a little suspect.
Not trying to troll, but from other pictures of eet fuks i've seen sell on ebay and other forums, those don't look right.
You could easily have a luthier pop out the dot inlays from an original mx220 and have these swapped in to then claim its an original "eet fuk".
89Twinturbo wrote:Those inlays look a little suspect.
Not trying to troll, but from other pictures of eet fuks i've seen sell on ebay and other forums, those don't look right.
You could easily have a luthier pop out the dot inlays from an original mx220 and have these swapped in to then claim its an original "eet fuk".
Don't worry, it has been done before on other guitars.
Clearly there is a difference. The first 2 pictures are what the seller here has and the last two are of an eet fuk that was sold on ebay a few years back by meestursparkle.
Look at the difference of the middle finger itself. This one is definitely fatter compared to meestersparkle and the spacing between each finger is different as well when you look at the two. The curvature of each finger is also different.
I'm not an expert and maybe each eet fuk was different coming from ESP, but personally, if I was interested in buying this guitar, that would be a red flag unless theres documentation or some way to verify its authenticity.
That price is silly just for the inlays IMO. Buy a regular ESP MX and have the inlays done. Save a fuckload of money.
I use to have a ESP MX Explorer that looked identical color wise, etc...., minus the inlays.
I'd rather buy another black ESP MX and have the Man to Wolf inlays professionally done over the EET Fuk at that insane pricetag.
That seller must be crazy unless he has all the documentation proving it's 100% legit. Even then IMO it's not worth that much.