difference between mh-400 and h-400
difference between mh-400 and h-400
I've never played a H, but my MH250NT is very strat like.
I have never played an "H" or "MH" that I considered "Strat-like". The shape is vaguely Strat-based, but the feel and sound is not similar at all, IMO.
Has there always been a maple neck on the MH-400NT? I bought mine some years ago (back when it was 81/81) and i thought is had a mahogany neck too.
I have never seen a mahogany neck MH-400NT, nor have I ever seen the specs stating it has a mahogany neck, maple only.
I have both a strat and a MH250NT... granted the strat has a carvin neck on it. Both are the roughly the same weight, have almost the same body shape, roughly the same gut cut, both string through (granted different bridge), both 6 inline, mine is roughly the same neck shape with the carvin neck... idk... its like calling a Viper "SG like", or a EC "LP like". Sound depends on pickups... if you have a 400 then you've got actives.
MH-400s have Floyds, and cockstock H-400s have stoptails.
Wood is the same. Tonally I would think they would be similar depending on the individual guitar.