New guitar: M-1000 or M-II?
New guitar: M-1000 or M-II?
They are both pretty much the same considering the tone, but the looks, and the comfort, the M1000 is better.
No way dude. Having played both in stores, the M-II was miles ahead in terms of playability and comfort. The bolt-on heel is not a large obstacle, for it is much smaller than the typical Fender style heels. I found no problem in reaching all of the frets. The abalone on the M-1000 sucks big-time as well is terms of looks, and the M-1000 has a painted neck, while the M-II's has a satin finish.
Tone knobs are overrated.
For $500 more (new), I would definitely get the M-II.
Go for the M-II, a better made bolt on will be better than an ok made neck through, and the angled neck plate on the M-II means the upper fret access isnt so bad...
I had an M-202, which was ok for upper fret access.
the ESP will likely be a much more resonant and sound better, you could have a tone knob/pot added, or just wire one into the cavity...
And I'm not sure whether it'd be worth routing a space for a 5 way selector switch (which I prefer).
A 5-way switch is useless on a guitar loaded with EMG 81/81
If you really need a tone knob, you can try using a concentric pot, but I'm not sure if you can get one that's the same diameter as the normal one. Try looking around.
Go for the M-II dude. Trust us, you'll love it more. The LTD may seem like a better guitar at the moment, but I've played both, and the M-II's are far superior.
i'm not knocking ltd but ive always seemed to have a neck issue with them 5-10 years down the road...they start to buzz....ESP NEVER....they truely are superior to the LTD brand
it seems like you've got your choice allready made.
I guess if it came down to looks you should take the m-1000.
I think the m-1000 plays as good as the m-II BUT it could very well be that the M-II is gonna feel moor versatile